Reviewer Guideline

Information for Reviewers

The Avicenna Anatolian Journal of Medicine employs a rigorous, independent, and unbiased double-blind peer-review process for the evaluation of submitted manuscripts. Articles are initially assessed by the Editorial Board for originality, methodology, and the significance of the topic. Following this, the manuscripts undergo evaluation by at least two independent experts in the relevant field. The Editorial Board retains the final authority over publication decisions for all submissions.

Reviewers are advised to familiarize themselves with the "Information for Reviewers" and "Instructions for Authors" sections of the journal before conducting their evaluations. All submissions must be reviewed based on their authenticity, validity, significance, and adherence to ethical standards.

The journal uses an Open Journal Systems (OJS) platform for managing the peer-review process. Reviewers can access the system using the username and password provided in the invitation email. Upon receiving an invitation to review, reviewers are expected to promptly decide whether to accept or decline the invitation. If the invitation is accepted, the review must be completed within the specified timeline. Reminder emails are sent in cases of delays.

Responsibilities of Reviewers

  1. Evaluation Criteria:

    • Reviewers should assess manuscripts for authenticity, scientific validity, methodological rigor, ethical compliance, novelty, and significance.
    • Specific attention should be given to:
      • The quality of the title and abstract.
      • The scientific structure and originality of the study.
      • The relevance and accuracy of the terminology used.
      • Adequacy of the references, figures, and tables.
      • Suitability of the English summary.
    • Reviewers must prioritize the manuscript's overall significance and suitability for publication in the journal.

  2. Ethical Considerations:

    • Reviewers are expected to identify potential ethical violations, such as:
      • Gift authorship.
      • Duplicate publication.
      • Plagiarism or data manipulation.
    • If reviewers suspect any ethical issues or conflicts of interest, they must inform the Editor before proceeding with the review.

  3. Reporting and Feedback:

    • Reviewers must complete the evaluation form available in the system and provide constructive feedback for the authors and editors.
    • Separate comments can be addressed to the authors and the Editorial Board.

  4. Final Review Checklist:
    Before submitting their evaluations, reviewers are expected to ensure:

    • Compliance with the journal's standards.
    • The absence of conflicts of interest.
    • The manuscript's adherence to ethical and scientific guidelines.

Benefits of Reviewing for the Avicenna Anatolian Journal of Medicine

  • Reviewers play a vital role in the publication process and are acknowledged as essential contributors to the journal's success.
  • A list of reviewers is published annually in the journal's final issue, accompanied by a special note of appreciation.
  • Certificates of appreciation are issued to reviewers for inclusion in their academic portfolios.
  • Manuscripts submitted by reviewers of the journal are given priority in the evaluation process.

Acknowledgment of Reviewers

  • A comprehensive list of all reviewers who have contributed during the year is published annually in the final issue of the journal as a gesture of appreciation for their invaluable efforts.
  • Reviewers can request a certificate of appreciation for their contributions, which will be issued by the journal for inclusion in their academic portfolio.

By participating in the peer-review process, reviewers contribute significantly to maintaining the high standards and scientific rigor of the Avicenna Anatolian Journal of Medicine.